← Back to Paper List

Position: The Real Barrier to LLM Agent Usability is Agentic ROI

Weiwen Liu, Jiarui Qin, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Yunjia Xi, Jianghao Lin, Chuhan Wu, Yasheng Wang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Defu Lian, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang
arXiv (2025)
Agent P13N Benchmark

📝 Paper Summary

Agent Evaluation Agent Usability
The primary barrier to LLM agent adoption is not technical capability but low Agentic ROI in mass-market domains, where interaction costs often exceed the time required for manual execution.
Core Problem
Current LLM agents are technically capable but lack usability in mass-market applications because the cognitive load and time required to prompt them often exceed the effort of using existing optimized UIs.
Why it matters:
  • Mass-market deployment is sparse (e.g., OpenAI Plus has ~10M users vs. recommendation engines with 700M+), indicating a huge untapped market
  • Pure performance optimization ignores the socio-technical ecosystem: if an agent takes longer to prompt than the task takes to do manually, users won't use it regardless of accuracy
  • There is a critical disconnect between high-demand domains (e-commerce, office work) and high-ROI domains (coding), creating a usability gap
Concrete Example: In office work, describing a task like 'Schedule a 30-minute sync with the team next week avoiding Thursdays' requires back-and-forth disambiguation with an agent. In contrast, the same task can be completed in seconds using a modern calendar UI, resulting in negative or negligible time savings for the agent approach.
Key Novelty
Agentic Return on Investment (Agentic ROI)
  • Formalize usability as a mathematical function of Information Gain and Time Savings divided by Cost, rather than just accuracy or success rate
  • Propose a 'Zigzag' development trajectory: first scale up for capability (Info Gain/Time Savings), then scale down for cost efficiency, similar to processor evolution
  • Introduce 'Sleep-time compute' as a strategy to improve quality without interaction latency by letting agents process user preferences and simulate paths during idle time
Architecture
Architecture Figure Figure 4
Strategic roadmap for optimizing Agentic ROI, showing a Zigzag path
Evaluation Highlights
  • Strong positive linear correlation (r=0.95) between user-reported usability ratings and calculated Agentic ROI across 5 domains
  • Identified inverse relationship between market demand and Agentic ROI: high-demand areas like E-commerce and Personal Assistance currently show low Agentic ROI
  • Survey of 34 users reveals that agent latency is not the primary barrier; prompting overhead and lack of net time savings are the main hurdles
Breakthrough Assessment
8/10
Provides a crucial theoretical re-framing of the agent usability problem. While not introducing a new model architecture, the Agentic ROI metric and Zigzag roadmap offer a strategic guide for the field.
×